Research article
Issue: № 2 (30), 2023


The article presents the results of studies conducted in 2019-2021, in which 4 irrigation regimes were examined with pre-irrigation thresholds of soil moisture 65-65-60, 70-70-65, 75-75-70, 80-80-75% HB against the background of 4 doses of mineral fertilizers N 70 P 30 K 23, N 105 P 45 K 34, N 140 P 60 K 45 and N 175 P 75 K 56 kg.d.v./ha in the conditions of the South of Russia. The results of field experiments showed that in order to achieve a cotton plant yield of 2 t/ha, 3 variants of combinations of the studied factors were established, of which the most effective was maintaining pre-irrigation soil moisture of 65-65-60 % HB and applying increased doses of fertilizers N 105 P 45 K 34 kg d. v./ha calculated for a yield of 3 t/ha, since with this combination of the studied factors, the yield of raw cotton plant was 1.94 t/ha at the lowest cost of irrigation water (CALL) 914 m3/t and the coefficient of water consumption (Kv) 1387 m3/t. To obtain a yield of 3 t/ha out of 3 variants, the greatest efficiency was observed at an available water supply level of 65-65-60% HB in combination with increased doses of fertilizers N 140 P 60 K 45 kg d. v./ha (for a yield of 4 t/ha). Here, the yield of raw cotton was 2.92 t/ha with the most efficient use of water (CALL was 596, and Kv was 905 m3/t). The best combination of the studied factors for obtaining a yield of 4 t /ha out of 2 established was the variant with maintaining the pre-irrigation threshold of soil moisture of 75-75-70% HB and the level of fertilization of N 140 P 60 K 45 kg d. v./ ha (for a yield of 4 t/ha). The irrigation water costs here were 522 m3/t, the water consumption coefficient was 704 m3/t, and the yield of raw cotton was 4.21 t/ha. Among the 3 variants of combinations of the studied factors to obtain a yield of 5 t/ha, the most effective was the variant combining pre-irrigation soil moisture of 75-75-70% HB and the application of mineral fertilizers with doses of N 175 P 75 K 56 kg d. v./ha (for a yield of 5 t/ha), since the maximum cotton yield was observed here was 5.14 t/ha, simultaneously with the minimum CALL – 432 and Kv – 581 m3/t.

Full text is available in pdf only


  • Minghui C. Water productivity and seed cotton yield in response to deficit irrigation: A global meta-analysis / C. Minghui, W. Haidong, F. Junliang [et al.] // Agricultural Water Management. — 2021. — Vol. 255. — No. 107027.

  • Li J. Increasing Crop Productivity in an Eco-Friendly Manner by Improving Sprinkler and Micro-Irrigation Design and Management: A Review of 20 Years' Research at the IWHR / J. Li // China Irrigation and Drainage. — 2018. — Vol. 67(1). — Р. 97-112.

  • Yaohu K. Effects of different water levels on cotton growth and water use through drip irrigation in an arid region with saline ground water of Northwest China / K. Yaohu, W. Ruoshui, W. Shuqin [et al.] // Agricultural Water Management. — 2012. — Vol. 109. — P. 117-126.

  • Timothy S.G. Rainwater use by cotton under subsurface drip and center pivot irrigation / S.G. Timothy, J.L. Robert // Agricultural Water Management. — 2019. — Vol. 215. — Р. 1-7.

  • Bronson K. Improving Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Efficiency in Surface- and Overhead Sprinkler-Irrigated Cotton in the Desert Southwest / K. Bronson, D. Hunsaker, J. Mon // Soil Science Society of America Journal. — 2017. — Vol. 81(6). — Р. 1401-1412.

  • Hong L. Deficit irrigation for enhancing sustainable water use: Comparison of cotton nitrogen uptake and prediction of lint yield in a multivariate autoregressive state-space model / L. Hong, J. Robert // Environmental and Experimental Botany. — 2011. — Vol. 71. — P. 224-231.

  • Sajjan S. Effect of deficit irrigation, phosphorous inoculation and cycocel spray on root growth, seed cotton yield and water productivity of drip irrigated cotton in arid environment / S. Sajjan, Р. Suresh, L. Panna // Agricultural Water Management. — 2016. — Vol. 169. — Р. 14-25.

  • Kaur А. Response of Bt cotton to nitrogen under drip and check basin method of irrigation under Punjab conditions / А. Kaur, S. Singh, K. Sekhon [et al.] // Research on Crops. — 2012. — Vol. 13(2). — Р. 708-710.

  • Sampathkumar T. Influence of deficit irrigation on growth, yield and yield parameters of cotton–maize cropping sequence / T. Sampathkumar, B. J. Pandian, M. V. Rangaswamy [et al.] // Agricultural Water Management. — 2013. — Vol. 130. — P. 90-102.

  • Иванов В.М. Хлопчатник в Нижнем Поволжье: монография / В.М. Иванов, Р.К. Туз. — Волгоград: Волгоградский ГАУ, 2015. — 132 с.

  • Овчинников А. С. Функциональное моделирование процессов выращивания хлопчатника / А. С. Овчинников, О. В. Кочеткова, И. Ю. Подковыров [и др.] // Известия Нижневолжского агроуниверситетского комплекса: наука и высшее профессиональное образование. — Волгоград: Волгоградский ГАУ, 2017. — № 3 (47). — С. 258-266.

  • Русеева З.М. Агроклиматический справочник по Волгоградской области / З.М. Русеева // М.: Let Me Print, 2012. — 146 с.

  • Ovchinnikov A.S. Agrobiological assessment of cotton breeding material in light chestnut soils / A.S. Ovchinnikov, O.H. Kimsanbaev, V.A. Antonov [et al.] // E3S Web of Conferences, 2020. — Vol. 203.