Main Article Content

Irina Konstantinovna Kravchenko, Dr
Ekaterina Vladimirovna Menko, Dr
Ekaterina Nikolaevna Tikhonova, Dr
Marina Vladimirovna Sukhacheva, Dr
Tatyana Vasilievna Kuznetsova, Dr


The succession of microbial community structure and function is a central ecological topic, as microbes drive the Earths biogeochemical cycles and are responsible for the regulation of the gaseous composition of the atmosphere, the processes of soils formation and their resistance to natural and anthropogenic factors. To elucidate the response and mechanistic underpinnings of soil methane-oxidizing microbial community structure and metabolic potential relevant to natural forest succession on gray forest soils of Moscow region from farming through the fallows of different ages (5-25 years) to a forest biocenosis was studied. Highest methane oxidation was observed from older restored sites its recovery with restoration age. Molecular analyses indicate the presence of aerobic type I and type II groups of methanotrophs in arable and meadow sites and only type II methanotophs in forested sites. Collectively, these data indicate shifts in microbial populations associated with methane oxidation in the context of soil restoration age and provide significant insights into the response of these microbial populations to severe disturbance and recovery.

Article Details

How to Cite
KRAVCHENKO, Irina Konstantinovna et al. METHANE OXIDATION AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF GRAY FOREST SOIL AS INFLUENCES BY FALLOW-TO-WOOD SUCCESSION. Journal of Agriculture and Environment, [S.l.], n. 4 (8), oct. 2018. ISSN 2564-890X. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 24 june 2019. doi:
Environmental science
Odum E.P. Ecology / Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Nueva York, 1963.
Torsvik V. Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems / Torsvik V., ?vreas L. // Curr Opin Microbiol. – 2002. – Ή 5. – P. 240–245.
Ranjard L. Monitoring complex bacterial communities using culture-independent molecular techniques: application to soil environment / Ranjard L., Poly F., Nazareth S. // Res Microbiol. – 2002. – Ή 151. –P. 167–177.
Gianfreda L. Soil enzyme activities as affected by anthropogenic alterations: intensive agricultural practices and organic pollution / Gianfreda L., Rao A.M., Piotrowska A. and others // Sc Total Environ. – 2005. – Ή 341(1–3). – P. 265–279.
Singh B.K. Microorganisms and climate change: Terrestrial feedbacks and mitigation options / Singh B.K., Bardgett R.D, Smith P. and others // Nat Rev Microbiol. – 2010. –Ή 8. – P. 779-790.
Hermans S.M. Bacteria as emerging indicators of soil condition / Hermans S.M., Buckley H.L., Case B.S. and others // Appl Environ Microbiol. – 2017. – Ή 83.
Dalal R. C. Greenhouse gas fluxes from natural ecosystems / Dalal R. C., Allen D. E. // Aust. J. Bot. – 2008. –Ή 56. – P. 369–407.
Dunfield P. F. The soil methane sink, in Greenhouse Gas Sinks eds. Reay D., Hewitt C. N., Smith K., Grace J., Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
Levine U. Y. Agriculture’s impact on microbial diversity and associated fluxes of carbon dioxide and methane / Levine U. Y., Teal T. K., Robertson G. P. and others // M.ISME J. – 2007. – Ή 5. – P. 1683–1691.
Kravchenko I. Short- and medium-term effects of NH4+ on CH4 and N2O fluxes in arable soils with different texture / Kravchenko I., Boeckx P., Galchenko V. and others // Soil Biol Biochem. – 2002. – Ή 34(5). – P. 669-678.
Semenov V.M. Experimental determination of the active organic matter content in some soils of natural and agricultural ecosystems / Semenov V.M., Kravchenko I.K., Ivannikova L.A. and others // Eurasian Soil Sc. – 2006. – Ή39. – P. 251-260.
12. Kravchenko I. Methane oxidation and diversity of aerobic methanotrophs in forest and agricultural soddy-podzolic soils / Kravchenko I., Sukhacheva M. // Appl Soil Ecol. – 2017. – Ή 119. – P. 267-274.
Kizilova A.K. Investigation of the methanotrophic communities in the hot springs of the Uzon caldera, Kamchatka, by molecular ecological techniques / Kizilova A.K., Dvoryanchikova E.N, Sukhacheva M.V. and others // Microbiology. – 2006. – Ή 81 (5). – P. 606-613.